Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinny Palermo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:55, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Vinny Palermo

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional piece, completely devoid of proper sourcing, non-notable position. Drmies (talk) 20:45, 26 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Local politician who fails WP:NPOLITICIAN. No indication of notability outside Omaha politics. --John B123 (talk) 21:18, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:24, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:24, 26 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - No significant coverage beyond the regular local news reporting.  -- Whpq (talk) 01:46, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - The contributor Johnato3126 was already blocked on Wikimedia Commons as a sock of  Johnjoshua1. 220.126.9.232 (talk) 09:07, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, no indication of notability – like millions of other local city/town/village officials, has attracted no interest outside the local area (and not much within it, either). All edits by this group of socks should be checked for WP:BLP violations, copyright violations and factual (in)accuracy. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:55, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Omaha is not a global city for the purposes of securing the "inherent" notability of its city councillors — so the test that an Omaha city councillor would have to pass is not "is he verifiable as existing", but "does he have a credible claim to being uniquely much more notable than most other city councillors", and absolutely nothing here suggests a reason why he would. Bearcat (talk) 00:11, 30 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.