Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinod Chowdhury


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 21:32, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Vinod Chowdhury

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails to meet WP:BIO, not there yet. kaeiou (talk) 17:31, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  17:55, 16 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fairly little in GoogleScholar and GoogleBooks, and not much else to indicate academic notability per WP:PROF. There were a couple of obits after his death but overall not enough specific coverage to pass WP:BIO either. Nsk92 (talk) 20:59, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Two obits in major Indian newspapers. that amounts to sufficient coverage. If I believed in the literal invocation of the GNG, it would be a strong keep, not a weak one.     DGG ( talk ) 00:26, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Nsk92. Pcap ping  02:41, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per literal invocation of the GNG. The dozen or so gnews hits, which could be used to fatten up the article a bit, and the two obits make me give the article the benefit of the doubt.John Z (talk) 22:19, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Supported by two weak obituaries, coverage not significant.  No awards. --Bejnar (talk) 05:47, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.