Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinod chohan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  07:21, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Vinod chohan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article copied from Draft space before being accepted. No suitable references and the only indication of notability is that he did his job (no serious accolades or academic positions), which is really more of a MILL situation. Primefac (talk) 07:58, 3 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I believe the article is relevant to the categories it belongs to. I am still working on it, so content and citation addition will soon be completed. I am more than happy to help with its improvement, but I think a deletion is too much. Just let me know what else to do. Thank you. Ellipapa (talk) 10:48, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep If one's jobhappens to be " technical coordinator for all CERN's Accelerators and Beam Experimental Areas," (which I think corresponds to CTO at the most important physics lab in the world), and if you become a Fellow of iEE because of it, that shows acknowledgement as an expert in one's field.  DGG ( talk ) 03:09, 5 August 2015 (UTC)` )
 * Keep -- A professor at CERN (which will use the term in the European (not American) sense will certainly be notable. This is currently a poor article, in that probably does not fully reflect his academic achievements.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:27, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:09, 10 August 2015 (UTC) I appreciate your help on that! Thank you very much! Have a nice day! Ellipapa (talk) 13:37, 14 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Hello! Could you please re-examine the article and withdraw some of the comments so that it corresponds the current needs? I just added some info, references, citations and also linked it to Simon Van der Meer's Wiki article so it is not orphan anymore.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk  13:24, 17 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.