Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinodh Reddy Chennu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:52, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Vinodh Reddy Chennu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )



Appears to be a self-published piece about someone with no notability. Searches turned up nothing about this individual. The current sources are all primary.  Onel 5969  TT me 04:44, 12 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Those are not self-published piece. He was student coordinator at NSS in 2013. Look at citations once — Preceding unsigned comment added by Santhoshred (talk • contribs) 05:49, 12 October 2015 (UTC)   Struck sockpuppet comment. —Psychonaut (talk) 11:24, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is not self-published. citation shows he is also editor-in-chief for Mechanical Magazine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Venkatdude (talk • contribs) 06:22, 12 October 2015 (UTC)   Struck sockpuppet comment. —Psychonaut (talk) 11:24, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * The author of the article stated on his talk page that he is Vinodh Reddy Chennu, as you can see here, so I think we can accept that it is self-published. 80.168.236.223 (talk) 11:51, 12 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. FYI, (with the same initials as the article's subject) removed the AFD notice and, , and  vandalized this page (the latter also untranscluded it).   —  Jeff G. ツ  (talk)   07:14, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 October 12.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 07:17, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * It was indeed correctly transcluded; the problem is that User:Venkatdude removed it. —Psychonaut (talk) 07:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete; the sources are not reliable and/or do not support a claim of notability. See also Sockpuppet investigations/Vinodhchennu. —Psychonaut (talk) 07:32, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. Non-notable individual. -KH-1 (talk) 08:09, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep, Sources are reliable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinodhchennu (talk • contribs) 09:18, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:NOTRESUME. No evidence of notability. No in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources. GermanJoe (talk) 13:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —  San ska ri  Hangout 13:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —  San ska ri  Hangout 13:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —  San ska ri  Hangout 13:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)


 * SNOW delete as there's simply nothing to suggest acception at this time. SwisterTwister   talk  17:50, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per nomination. —  San ska ri  Hangout 17:57, 12 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.