Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vintage Vinyl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 04:58, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Vintage Vinyl

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly sourced, and a WP:BEFORE sweep does not bring up enough significant sourcing to satisfy GNG.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 13:38, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 13:38, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 13:38, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 13:38, 22 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep poorly sourced is not an argument. If sources such as the rolling stone exist to support the facts.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:35, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The article is about the owner and devotes little more than a passing mention to the store itself, thus not being significant coverage.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 19:01, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:14, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Easy Keep - Sourcing in RS showing WP:SIGCOV are plentiful. Here's Billboard for example. FOARP (talk) 13:17, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Same issue as above - even though sources are “plentiful”, the only one you mention only gives a couple sentences to the store and is not about the store, it is about the store’s owner.
 * WP:SIGCOV requires that the source "addresses the topic directly and in detail". This does so by telling you where and when the store was established, how many records it stocks, and who received inspiration from it. Hence, this is WP:SIGCOV. FOARP (talk) 13:54, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I also would like to see your plentiful sources, as the Billboard source was the only one mentioned in this entire AfD.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 15:09, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Let me Google that for you, and this, and this, you get the picture. FOARP (talk) 19:57, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * weak keep The coverage I found was mainly local and/or passing mentions. However, I think this squeaks by the GNG.Sandals1 (talk) 14:37, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Scott Burley (talk) 03:52, 5 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.