Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinyl Life


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy Delete under R2. (non-admin closure) Unionhawk Talk E-mail 14:22, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Vinyl Life

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable per WP:BAND, speedy deletion removed by anonymous WP:SPA, references unreliable per WP:RS Per Ardua (talk) 14:56, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  —Per Ardua (talk) 14:59, 11 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. Passes WP:BAND #5. Could use improvement however. This article on Vinyl Life is a stub. WP:MUSIC says a band is notable if it "has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician or ensemble itself and reliable." I've added four non-blog reviews/articles. Bech86 (talk) 20:33, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * WP:BAND #5, "Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels". Vinyl Life has released one album through Tape Theory. Not seeing the pass. Duffbeerforme (talk) 13:43, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete With the possible exception of NeuFutur I'm not seeing any coverage whose source is independent from the musician or ensemble itself and reliable. Blogs, shops and what looks like a press release. Duffbeerforme (talk) 05:23, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Sources are reliable and independent from the ensemble., , , . And not all from blogs. This article on Vinyl Life is a stub and needs to be expanded. Bech86 (talk) 20:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC) [[Image:Achtung.svg|20px|]] — Duplicate !vote: Bech86 (talk • contribs) has already cast a !vote above.
 * future-retro (1) is a shop, elektroaddict (3) looks like a press release, allmusic (4) just verifies their existance and provides no coverage past release information or track listings. leaving one possible RS, NeuFutur (2). [[Image:Achtung.svg|20px|]] — Duplicate !vote: Duffbeerforme (talk) 08:29, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Not a !vote. I didn't say keep or delete or anything like that. Duffbeerforme (talk) 08:36, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * You are correct. You did not. Bech86 (talk) 08:44, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: Bech86, the article create and only major editor, has moved the article to their userspace to work on. --JD554 (talk) 12:31, 25 August 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.