Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Violet Cripps, Baroness Parmoor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 10:54, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Violet Cripps, Baroness Parmoor

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Well, this is embarrassing. 11 years ago I created this article and now I do not know what I was thinking. I can hardly find any information about the subject other than basic genealogical data such as whom she married and to whom she gave birth, so this falls under WP:INVALIDBIO and WP:NOTGENEALOGY. The title is also nonsensical, as noted at Help_desk. In my defense, I was young, very young. Let's get this over with and never speak of it again, please :) Surtsicna (talk) 11:30, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Royalty and nobility,  and United Kingdom. Surtsicna (talk) 11:30, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, as proposed. -- Hoary (talk) 11:36, 20 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Redirect or Delete. There's this passing mention about her interests here, which is not SIGCOV. Not sure what the proper redirect target could be, given her numerous marriages and being initially born into a baronetage herself. Pilaz (talk) 14:53, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete only mention I can find outside genealogy is that she was "A leading member of the Society of Friends she had been connected with peace movements in Britain and the Continent for nearly 50 years, and has been for some years president of the Women's International League." but nothing to flesh out anything encyclopedic. MilborneOne (talk) 14:57, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect...she was of some note as Violet Duchess of Westminster if you search on that name but the article on her second husband (the 2nd Duke of Westminster) could be the best place to cover her.108.29.145.226 (talk) 18:17, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment A note of admiration to the nominator for not only admitting to a well-intentioned error from a long time ago, but also taking a very public step to correct it. This is wonderful to see. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:38, 26 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.