Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Violet Lim


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:53, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Violet Lim

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources. Does not meet notability criteria. Citobun (talk) 04:57, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — Nizolan  (talk) 06:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. — Nizolan  (talk) 06:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete – Independent coverage in English seems to amount to the Yahoo Finance interview cited in the article, an Asia One article the text of which seems to have mostly disappeared, and a South China Morning Post article that cites her a few times. Might change my mind if there's more coverage in Chinese but I doubt it (you'd expect there to be English coverage since she's active in Hong Kong and Singapore). — Nizolan  (talk) 07:04, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - I did find coverage of her, but most coverage focusing on her seems to be in self published sources. Apart from the wo sources above, reliable sources mention her only in passing. Not notable or maybe too soon to have an article at this time. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:53, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: I also noticed that there is a conflict of interest. The article creator Cheriefoo123 seems to be either related to the article subject or is an employee of the article subject. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as clearly nothing for imaginably better notability. SwisterTwister   talk  01:27, 30 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.