Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vionic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (G5, Changingguardsatbuckinghampalace). MER-C 13:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Vionic

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This article was wholly written by someone flagged as a likely paid editor, the article does a poor job of establishing notability and conveys little encyclopaedic information. WyldEys (who has reviewed several unrelated articles tagged for UPE with the goal of making them neutral and asked me to opine on their suggestions) notes on the talk page that they think the notability of the topic is borderline, and I'm inclined to agree on a cursory look. Given all the issues, I am recommending application of WP:TNT here, if the organisation is notable then it will be better to start a new, neutral and encyclopaedic article free from any involvement by paid editors. Thryduulf (talk) 19:52, 21 November 2021 (UTC) Note: In case its helpful to anyone, I was looking for sources and only came up with these that I thought would be acceptable: Source: Healthline, Source: MSN, Source: NBC News. And 2 about the founder (sensitive story): The Guardian article, conviction WyldEys (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 19:57, 21 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.