Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viorel Cute-Petric


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 19:07, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Viorel Cute-Petric

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No multiple, independent sources on this individual. Gets one mention about an exhibition in his local paper (as well as a passing mention a few years earlier), and that seems to be it. Hardly the "significant coverage" expected by WP:GNG. Biruitorul Talk 17:09, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this person. Joe Chill (talk) 21:22, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Even assuming that sources are biased against people who dedicate their career to "maternity, flight, the beauty of the female body, germination", this biography utterly lacks coverage, and there are no significant secondary sources to even attest something about this artist. Looks like this article was germinated through self-promotion. Dahn (talk) 04:10, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No objection to speedy deletion. Glass  Cobra  16:54, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.