Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viper Recordings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 05:06, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Viper Recordings

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:COMPANY. Unable to locate significant secondary sources to support notability. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:35, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:29, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:17, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:17, 12 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable company with a stable of equally non-notable artists. Article is a directory with next to no content. sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  02:51, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- fails notability guidelines and overly promotional / fancruft with an incredible amount of nn singles listed. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:15, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete As the article has no prose, and filled up with tables, even which are unreferenced, delete per WP:NOTDIRECTORY. --Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:54, 16 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.