Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virgin Grand Prix results


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. with no prejudice against recreating as a redirect is that really is necessary or beneficial. Dennis - 2&cent; 22:33, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Virgin Grand Prix results
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An article that has unnecessarily been spun out of a parent article, Virgin Racing. Results tables are regularly included within team articles. Some teams, most notably Ferrari, McLaren and Williams do have separate articles for their results, but they have been in the sport for decades. Virgin were in the sport for two. A current discussion at the Formula 1 WikiProject suggests that a team should compete for at least ten years before a separate article for results is created. This article should be deleted, and its content restored to its original location. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 22:14, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 19 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Query. Why can't this just be redirected to the main article? Pburka (talk) 01:45, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with Prisonermonkeys, there was no need to separate the results table in the first place. The table itself is non-notable and therefore it fails to comply WP:GNG and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Besides, Virgin Racing is a very short article and will keep that way for the time being, so its size isn't an argument for splitting it into two. Regards. --Urbanoc (talk) 05:30, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.