Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virgin Land (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 05:17, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Virgin Land (disambiguation)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This disambiguation page for "Virgin Land" only contains a single entry which contains the term, Virgin Lands Campaign. The other entries are: 1. a red link and 2. a link to Frontier, which the author states is synonymous with "Virgin land" but as we all know, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. WP:NOTDIC. Pstanton (talk) 04:54, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: Number 1 is a redirect. I only listed the second since Virgin land redirects to Frontier.--DrWho42 (talk) 04:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and move to Virgin Land as malplaced dab. (I think the Virgin land redirect to Frontier should be deleted, since the article makes no mention of "virgin land", but that's an issue for RfD.) -- JHunterJ (talk) 16:44, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 14:20, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. I've added a couple of entries. Move per JHunterJ. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:39, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete and move the Doctor Who entry to the title. It is the only article with "Virgin Land" title on Wikipedia. The only other possibility to frontier can possibly be put as a hatnote. Tavix | Talk  02:51, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Ambiguous topics do not have to have complete articles, so long as they are ambiguous and mentioned. See MOS:DABMENTION. -- JHunterJ (talk) 10:54, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.