Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virgin Trains (open access operator)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. It seems that the majority of participants see these two companies as separate entities and there is opposition to a Merge of the two similarly named companies. Liz Read! Talk! 01:37, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Virgin Trains (open access operator)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Page already exists here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_Trains MrBauer24 (talk) 00:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Oppose, Virgin Trains is about a train operator that ceased in 2019, this is about a separate prospective operator with a different ownership structure. Virgin Trains was a franchised operator, if it comes to fruition, this will be an open access operator.In the same way that we have Flybe (1979-2020) and Flybe (2022–2023), same brand, but otherwise completely different. 00:15, 7 July 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grenfruy (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and United Kingdom.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:32, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep, As said by Grenfuy, it is a different corporation.
 *  00:58, 7 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  00:57, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge as it does not appear the future incarnation is yet notable. Can be covered within the extant article until such time as notability changes and it can be spun out. Star   Mississippi  01:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  03:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge to Virgin Trains per Star. If they win the bid we can consider a split then Jumpytoo Talk 21:04, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per Grenfruy, or merge to a new overview article about the various uses of the Virgin brand in relation to UK railways. I Oppose merging to an existing article because none of those listed Virgin Trains (disambiguation) are suitable merge targets (based on those articles and the dab page). Thryduulf (talk) 01:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: For the same reasons as stated by Grenfuy as it is a different corporation. Rillington (talk) 05:44, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:03, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment. Given the new government's stated policy to renationalise the railways, is this proposal even valid any more? -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:07, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Unless and until we know a lot more detail about the new plans it's impossible to say whether open access operators will be a feature of a nationalised railway (there are hundreds (at least) of possible structures it could take), but that's only tangentially relevant crystal ball-gazing. This is notable as a proposal (probably individually, definitely as part of a broader article) whether they end up ever running trains or not. Thryduulf (talk) 17:25, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep: as above, and also worth noting that the new corporation's proposal has plenty of coverage already. — Alien333 (what I did &amp; why I did it wrong) 19:02, 14 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.