Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virginia Chittick Flaherty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-09 08:55Z 

Virginia Chittick Flaherty

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This fails every rule in the book. The article was written by a single user who has not made any other contributions to Wikipedia. There are no links in or out. Most importantly, there are no references. I'll have trouble finding any on my own because there's almost nothing about her on the Internet. If everything the article says about her is true, she might be notable, but we'll never know. Also, regarding the last paragraph, Wikipedia is not a memorial. YechielMan 05:15, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article doesn't assert notability; nothing on google but WP and mirrors.  Article reads like a copyvio. Dave6 05:27, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Edeans 09:03, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:V The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. Any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged needs a reliable source, which should be cited in the article. If an article topic has no reliable, third-party sources, Wikipedia should not have an article on it. Jeepday 14:50, 5 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.