Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viridian Doom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Wknight94 (talk) 18:04, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Viridian Doom

 * — (View AfD)

We are not a how-to guide, not assertion of notability of the drink is provided. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 18:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC) HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 18:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a how to guide. Hello32020 20:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep How is this article any diffrent to other cocktail articles? It is not a "how too" it is a discritption of a drink.--Prophesy 18:16, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, other than telling me how to make it, there is no other content other than it is a highly alcaholic cocktail drink. So it looks like a how-to guide and nothing else to me. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 18:39, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * So where is the diffrence between this and the entry for B52 other than a dubious clame based on roumer as to the origon of the name? If i put that this drinks name comes from? If this dose not fit the regulations of an article (insidently on the list of what wikipeida is not it dose not mention that it is not a how too guide and i do not see how this article fits any of the other items on that list) If you are to delete this one then you may as well delete every cocktail entry. --Prophesy 21:03, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The difference would be notability in society. Can you show any publication that refer to this drink? HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 23:42, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete.  See WP:NOT and WP:NOT#4 "Instruction manuals".  See also: WP:Notability and Inclusion is not an indicator of notability  -- Chondrite 18:48, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. Quale 06:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.