Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viridiana Salazar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per the latest sources. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:19, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Viridiana Salazar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested Prod, however deletion rationale remains valid, namely: the player fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG.

A number of sources have been added to the article, but these are insufficient to satisfy GNG for the following reasons:


 * ligafemenil.mx - Primary source unsuitable for GNG
 * marca.com - brief interview with the player following a specific match. Actually very little content specifically about the player, more her speaking about her team. Not significant coverage of the player herself.
 * sipse.com - very brief interview with the player. Again little content about her, her comments are focussed more on her team and thoughts on a single upcoming match. Not significant coverage of the player herself. Fenix down (talk) 10:52, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * From the sources below, although there are several which are very brief and at least one which is simply a blog, which I would not say contributed to GNG. There are a couple of lengthy sources which I had not seen before which, when added to the more minor reporting about the player probably do in this instance equate to a GNG pass. Can't withdraw the nomination as there are other Delete votes below, but happy for the closing admin to view my opinion now as Keep. Fenix down (talk) 10:27, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Fenix down (talk) 10:52, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 10:56, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 10:57, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 10:57, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 10:57, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 10:57, 25 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 12:10, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NFOOTY having not played pro football. Govvy (talk) 18:02, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - passes WP:GNG, see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 etc. The subject is discussed in detail in all the sources. The fact that she doesn't play in what is considered a "professional league" is irrelevant. Inter&#38;anthro (talk) 02:31, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep substantial coverage has been found that passes WP:GNG and that has prompted the nominator to change to a keep vote Atlantic306 (talk) 18:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GNG. WP:FOOTY covers one women's top-division league last I checked. We should explore why that is. Hmlarson (talk) 22:37, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Hmlarson (talk) 22:44, 30 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.