Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtual Woman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. -- ferret (talk) 20:35, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Virtual Woman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

After removal of a Washington Post blog source which cites a website of dubious credentials, this article is left with one secondary source: an SMH blog which does not provide depth of coverage. The article makes some dubious claims: its number of downloads, for some reason listed under "In popular culture", is not verifiable; the lead calls it the "oldest form of virtual life", which is ridiculous. It also includes a lot of personal opinion under "Criticisms". I can find no evidence of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. — Bilorv ( talk ) 10:47, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Bilorv ( talk ) 10:47, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:47, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 03:14, 24 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.