Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtual library


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was: Consensus to redirect to Digital library; former content is available here for anybody to merge, if desired. (Early close.) - Mike Rosoft 07:42, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Virtual library

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Admittedly old terminology, replaced nowadays by Digital library. The lengthy passage can be summerized "Some companies put relevant resources on their websites to help clients" with a negligible specific example (that does not resemble a library ). This is also one of the targets of spammer user:artdhtml. trespassers william 14:01, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Little useful content; I'd say that the simplest solution would be to redirect the article to Digital library. - Mike Rosoft 14:08, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree, this is a case for a merge/redirect, not a delete. --Itub 14:49, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Digital library. --soum talk 16:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect is fine by me. (There is no "Articles for Redirection" page or something like that, right?) trespassers william 16:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * No, because if you want to redirect an article, you do it yourself. Morgan Wick 20:37, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect Article pretty much says it. No need to explain the old term really. OSborn 18:21, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect - As per nom.--Edtropolis 19:23, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.