Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtual var


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete.  K ilo-Lima|(talk) 11:20, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Virtual var
Delete. Self-serving neologism. Advertisement. Prod removed by author. cmh 02:56, 10 April 2006 (UTC) Keep. Concept is becoming more and more common place in the Value Added Reseller (VAR) industry. This is real, and not Advertisement/SPAM. If you contact your local Value Added Reseller and asked if they can remotely service you then they are applying the Virtual VAR concept. --Workopia 04:27, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO and WP:SPAM. Only 168 unique Google results, most of which are not relevant -- T B C [[Image:Confused-tpvgames.gif|18px|]] ???  ???   ??? 03:02, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per TBC. Roy  boy cr ash  fan  [[Image:Flag of Texas.svg|30px]] 03:12, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. ≈ jossi ≈ t &bull; @ 04:22, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The article cannot be kept if the concept is only "becoming" more popular, the concept has to be popular. Well, at least popular enough for more than under 200 Google results or a mention from a notable media source. -- T B C [[Image:Confused-tpvgames.gif|18px|]] ???  ???   ??? 05:09, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, understood, still new to Wikipedia, thanks. --Workopia 05:20, 10 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete nn.ßlηguγεη | Have your say!!! 05:59, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete "becoming more popular" or "up and coming" or "rising popularity" translates to "delete " in wikipedia speak &rArr;    SWAT Jester   [[Image:Flag_of_Iceland.svg|18px|]]  Ready    Aim    Fire!  06:31, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per above discussion. Metamagician3000 07:34, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, intolerably vague, advertisement, and close to patent nonsense: a "framework for servicing vendor product"? Smerdis of Tlön 13:50, 10 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.