Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virus Attack


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No target to redirect to Guerillero  &#124;  My Talk  05:46, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Virus Attack

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This does seem to be a cartoon which was broadcast on Italian Cartoon-Network, however I was unable to find any reliable sources that might attest to this subject's notability. Furthermore, the current state of the article (unsorurced, borderline-nonsense) might be a candidate for speedy deletion. Salimfadhley (talk) 13:22, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 15:39, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 15:40, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 15:40, 23 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect - The current article under this name simply fails WP:N but is also a commonly used term for different situations. Computer virus attack, biological virus attack, and a couple of others that seem to be in the disambiguation page of Viral.  If you also feel redirect, then there might be a better place to have it point too? - Pmedema (talk) 18:39, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - Virus Attack may be an incorrect translation of the title. The show might have another name in English. Unless there are sources that can attest to the show's notability then deletion is probably the safest bet. --Salimfadhley (talk) 09:19, 24 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 17:13, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buffbills7701 03:06, 7 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.