Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VisaHQ


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. clpo13(talk) 18:07, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

VisaHQ

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORP. The entity has 155 appearances in Google News but the appearances are on non-reliable blogs, press releases, non-reliable newspapers and some notable, reliable newspapers. For the notable, reliable newspapers, they're just mentions of the name or are quotes from an employee (ie or ). This is not enough to meet WP:CORPDEPTH, a primary criteria of WP:GNG. CerealKillerYum (talk) 16:07, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:29, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:29, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:29, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:30, 2 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- advertisement. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:27, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * delete might have gone as WP:CSD. Sometimes subjects have inflated G-hits through google bombing. Certainly a page here could not hurt. This would explain lack of depth-- appearance w/o substance.Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:53, 10 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.