Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visa policy of Albania


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Per ANI can we have a single discussion somewhere? Spartaz Humbug! 04:44, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Visa policy of Albania

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete Not encyclopedic at all. Not a notable topic, at all. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, which is exactly what this article is. Basket of Puppies 02:35, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Could you please be more specific at what you claim to not be encyclopedic? There are several articles of this nature in Wikipedia and they are in good standing. --  S ulmues (talk) 02:52, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * An indiscriminate collection of information is not encyclopedic. Stating the visa agreements between random countries is not encyclopedic in the least as it literally is a random collection of information. Basket of Puppies  03:04, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Your "literal" use of "random" seems to mean "sourced, accurate information about country-by-country relationships, grouped by country". This is a meaning of "random" of which I was previously unaware.bobrayner (talk) 06:18, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong keep: If you want to make a notability issue, that's one question, the policy you bring has nothing to do with the article. It is not an indiscriminate collection of information, rather it's a notable issue that affects many people. We may make an elaborate research on what an encyclopedia is and isn't, but in WikiPedia things work with notability. The subject is notable, there is an article on it. Please contribute rather than tear down articles: I have seen that you are bringing for deletion dozens of such articles. --  S ulmues (talk) 03:49, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong keep: It's notable. It's information that affects a lot of people. It's sourced. I do not understand why Basket of Puppies is so keen to delete so many visa-related pages, nor do I understand which part of WP:NOT they violate.bobrayner (talk) 06:16, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong keep: as per keeps above. Alinor (talk) 13:12, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Cut from erroneously created 2nd nom:


 * Keep per editors above. Cheers. —  Kedadi  talk  15:12, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:40, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge Definately encyclopedic and useful for people but I can't help thinking that in some case the information would best be represented in a list/table or something to avoid redunduncies. Dr.  Blofeld  17:26, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 *  Strong Keep Good solid factual and useful information, which is encyclopedic. It is clearly notable. scope_creep (talk) 18:41, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per various of the above editors. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 17:44, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.