Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viscount de São Jorge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Visconde de São Jorge. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:29, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Viscount de São Jorge

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested prod without improvement. This essay consists entirely of original research and would have to be rewritten from scratch to become neutral and encyclopedic. I'm also wondering exactly where and when this allegedly false information about the title was spread on Wikipedia. Any articles with diffs to prove this claim? De728631 (talk) 19:51, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
 * delete - an opinion piece, unreferenced. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:50, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 12 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment: The article's author has now commented at Talk:Viscount de São Jorge. It turns out that there is already an article Visconde de São Jorge which finds to be inappropriate. In fact there are unsourced allegations made in that article against one Guilherme Manuel Gonçalves de Oliveira de Sousa Girão (note the username). I have advised him that such issues should be dealt with at the existing article instead of writing counterstatements. De728631 (talk) 17:20, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I have now removed the negative BLP-related statements from this verion of "Visconde de São Jorge" and restored a previous more neutral revision (which is still not very good in terms of references). De728631 (talk) 17:30, 12 October 2013 (UTC)


 * With an article existing about the topic I'm now suggesting we redirect the new Viscount de São Jorge to Visconde de São Jorge. De728631 (talk) 22:44, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.