Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viscultus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. A7 Tone 13:48, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Viscultus

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Possible hoax. Google gives no hits for the name of this religion. No evidence of notability, etc. Verbal   chat  07:48, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete and close This is a clear CSD A7, and was tagged as so - instead of using hangon - by an anon IP. Then it was PROD, and that was also removed by anon IP. Possibly a hoax, but if not hoax, A7 for sure. Could an admin be bold at take this cruft out of its misery?--Cerejota (talk) 08:21, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, I thought the speedy had been declined. I agree it should be speedied. Author added link to Flying Spaghetti Monster, clearly a hoax. Verbal   chat  08:31, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  -- Cerejota (talk) 08:22, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions.  -- Cerejota (talk) 08:22, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Article has one reference, which doesn't even mention it. No clear assertion of notability and clearly not notable, even if it is real, which we can't even begin to verify. If you look on the talk page you will see a note from the author in which he admits that there is absolutely nothing to reference it to. --DanielRigal (talk) 09:40, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as a hoax. As a datapoint, 'vis' does not mean 'nature' in Latin; that's 'natura'. 'Vis' means 'life force', or more often, simply 'force, might'; it's the word normally used to refer to military strength, for example. 'Vis cultus' crudely means 'might-worship', and implies (to me) a kind of Nietzschean approach to the will. It also suggests to me that the hoaxer here knows no Latin, and doesn't fully understand how to use a Latin dictionary, either. AlexTiefling (talk) 12:12, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Clearly a hoax. -- Frehley  Space Ace 12:40, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.