Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visegrad Insight


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America1000 13:46, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Visegrad Insight

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement ([as well as [Wikipedia:Notability (newspapers)]]). It was initially prodded by User:I dream of horses with insufficient rationale, and the prod was declined on technical grounds by User:James500. As I do share to concerns about notability of this tiny publication (reported circulation 6k, no history to speak of) I am bringing it here. As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:49, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  19:40, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Publications-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  19:40, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  18:28, 16 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  21:13, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 24 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.