Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visendo fax server


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   ''Speedy delete. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:40, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Visendo fax server

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

No independent sources showing notability, Promotional. Contested PROD. Muhandes (talk) 23:57, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 01:31, 1 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - non-notable, purely promotional. One of a long running series of articles about this company and its products, all speedily deleted. andy (talk) 10:23, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Andyjsmith. Invitrovanitas (talk) 10:46, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Just read a line or 2 up. Signed by Barts1a Suggestions/complements? Complaints and constructive criticism? 10:49, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam. In fact if nobody objects in a while I am inclined to accept Barts1a's proposal for speedy deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:21, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete — pure advertisement. I won't object to speedy deletion.  Favonian (talk) 11:42, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I didn't ask for speedy deletion as the article is almost two years old and the other speedy deleted were one day old. Note that all content contributors to article are blocked now. Seems like WP:SNOW. --Muhandes (talk) 12:27, 1 December 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.