Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishal Mangalwadi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 15:57, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Vishal Mangalwadi

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Not notable. Fails WP: GNG, WP: AUTHOR. No external / reliable citations or references. Fail to find any external references. Just being an author of some books is not a criteria to be in wiki. Nominating for deletion. Bharathiya (talk) 06:51, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:56, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 29 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 10:56, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Delete for lack of evidence of passing WP:GNG and complete lack of reliable third-party sources. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:21, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep as there is evidence of notability, but not presented properly. Article is being developed with sources. We can watch the progress of article to take furher deciscion for deletionRayabhari (talk) 09:06, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 04:09, 13 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete If it is not ready to be published here as stipulated above, and is not presented properly, then it should not be here and falls under WP:SPECULATION & WP:NN until it is ready for inclusion. Яεñ99 (talk) 08:50, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Info aded The article is slightly developed with sources, for review.Rayabhari (talk) 13:17, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep given the improvements and the addition of sources. Secret of success (talk) 12:30, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.