Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishal Saxena


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:15, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Vishal Saxena

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable person. Fails WP:GNG, and WP:ANYBIO — usernamekiran (talk)  21:38, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:11, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:11, 20 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete I cringed when I read that the subject seems to think that the Hasselblad he professes to love so much is a full-frame camera when it's a Medium format camera. The article is promotional garbage. The subject is an amateur. On a more serious note: The subject has not received substantial coverage in independent, reliable sources and fails every criterion of WP:CREATIVE: 1) He is not regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors. 2) He is not known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique. 3) He has not created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. 4a) His work has not become a significant monument 4b) His work has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition 4c) His work has not won significant critical attention 4d) His work is not represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. Mduvekot (talk) 02:49, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * BTW, there is a chance he owns Hasselblad HV, which is the only Full Frame Hasselblad. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:33, 20 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete Promotional article for commercial photographer, clearly failing WP:GNG and all of WP:CREATIVE criteria. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:31, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Grotesque, as described above. Delete. -- Hoary (talk) 14:19, 20 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.