Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishal vasan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No evidence presented of reaching WP:GNG nor WP:PROF. j⚛e deckertalk 18:32, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Vishal vasan

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Fails WP:PROF Apparently this article was his graduation present Darkness Shines (talk) 17:48, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 19:57, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 19:57, 23 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete I'm sure this guy is great at what he does and the article was made in good faith unfortunatly Wikipedia isn't a crystal ball of future notable people, not every Dr can have an article unfortunatlySeasider91 (talk) 20:04, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete More or less this is just a WP:Resume and does not belong on Wikipedia. - The Determinator   p  t  c  20:23, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete -- per Seasider; and WP:TOOSOON. Not enough awards or Google hits.  No prejudice against recreation.  We do wish you well Vishal! -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 20:24, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Citation counts are far too low for WP:PROF and what else is there? —David Eppstein (talk) 20:58, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:PROF no source to prove WP:GNG either. -- D Big X ray  21:13, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete The article's subject, at its presence (he definitely can be notable in the future) fails WP:PROF and does not feature significant coverage in reliable third-party sources. → B  music  ian  03:10, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia cannot have a page for every mathematics Ph.D. I'm sure the article was made in good faith but this fails WP:PROF. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TeaganK (talk • contribs) 00:56, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No third-party references and no evidence of notability Anbu121  ( talk me ) 09:24, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.