Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishnu Govind (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV.

Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Deletion review - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year! Missvain (talk) 00:37, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Vishnu Govind
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:SIGCOV. There is an award but only minor coverage.  scope_creep Talk  10:06, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:17, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:17, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:18, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: as per nom. - Hatchens (talk) 17:47, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - Besides passing WP:CREATIVE as demonstrated by the 50th Kerala State Film Awards ("The person is regarded as an important figure"), I don't understand how the nom can claim "minor coverage" when there are multiple examples of in-depth coverage already in the article. The Hindu and the New Indian Express  all collectively demonstrate this sound designer is beyond the threshold of passing WP:GNG. Oakshade (talk) 04:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * That is primary problem with this article, these are PR interview's, made at the begining of the film, in question. They fail WP:BLPPRIMARY. They are not secondary sources, and this is a WP:BLP. Where is the secondary sources. I've no doubt the Kerala award is notable, re: last Afd, but where is the other secondary sources. Not interviews. Real secondary sources. The gold standard for BLP's, references that are needed to prove notabilty. .  scope_creep Talk  10:18, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * There are many sources attached to this article that are not good, but that does not negate the ones that are. That would be a matter of regular editing, not deletion. Oakshade (talk) 16:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * We will go through the references. Most of them routine annoucements and film PR.   scope_creep Talk  16:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: Fails WP:SIGCOV-  SUN EYE 1  19:56, 24 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.