Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishnu S Warrier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 03:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Vishnu S Warrier

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is hardly any evidence of notability provided for this person. This article does not provide enough good quality references. The blog/website supposedly authored by this person is also not notable. delete per lack of any WP:RS to support notability. Uncletomwood (talk) 07:53, 24 October 2015 (UTC)


 * delete - non-notable, self published sources. DangerDogWest (talk) 08:25, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America1000 03:34, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —  San ska ri  Hangout 13:34, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —  San ska ri  Hangout 13:34, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —  San ska ri  Hangout 13:34, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Said person is one of the popular author and legal educator. He is an expert in the field of Arbitration Law. The Books authored by him are bestsellers (Rank #93, Ref: http://www.amazon.in/Arbitration-Conciliation-Mediation-Vishnu-Warrier/dp/9351435547/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1445833059&sr=1-1&keywords=vishnu+s+warrier). I am of the opinion that, the page shall be retained.

Books and other articles found published have been found true. Said book titles are also published by reputed publishers. Hence, the page may be retained. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.15.72.34 (talk) 04:20, 26 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. no evidence the published material is actually important. No apparent university position; awards are for being a college chess player.  DGG ( talk ) 03:44, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  18:36, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm not sure WP:PROF is the right criterion, since he seems to be more of an independent entrepreneur than an academic. But we also don't have evidence of passing WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Don't Delete: Found an interview (Ref: http://superlawyer.in/vishnu-warrier-founding-lex-warrier-cracking-clat-pg-work-miniratna-hll-lifecare/) may be relevant in this context.
 * Delete - I couldn't find any references on my own about this person, and the references cited in the articles were from primary or non-independent sources that don't appear to be independent of the subject (such as "About the Author" sections on book selling websites or sites that appear to have direct involvement with the author or his legal services). I'm not seeing any secondary reliable sources required to establish notability per WP:GNG. Also fails WP:AUTHOR.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   06:03, 4 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Don't Delete: Could find out One more book authored by this person. Ref: http://www.lexisnexis.in/understanding-patent-law.htm I think we should not delete this page
 * Delete. Article is all assertion. Can't find any meaningful evidence of notability. Agricola44 (talk) 17:16, 6 November 2015 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.