Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishnu purushan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:23, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Vishnu purushan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails GNG, doesn't seem notable according to WP:NACTOR Sanyam.wikime (talk) 05:09, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Sanyam.wikime (talk) 05:09, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Sanyam.wikime (talk) 05:09, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Sanyam.wikime (talk) 05:09, 15 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom.  Java Hurricane  05:33, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable actor. Fails WP:GNG. Jai49 (talk) 05:51, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet notability criteria for actors. If we actually enforrced GNG on actor articles we might avoid making it to 1 million articles on living people this year. Considering that some editors fight tooth and nail against even considering deleting actor articles with not even one reliable source which should be speedy deleted under biography of living people criteria if no reliable source is added, I have my doubts we will see any progress against actor articles especially considering how many with one non-reliable source have sat in that condition for over a decade. There is hope for change, but not much.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:21, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete PointComm (talk) 15:54, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep or Draftify: The subject is an up-and-coming actor who has already had some significant roles in notable films, so I don't see much of a problem with WP:NACTOR. WP:GNG is the bigger issue here, with only one The Hindu article—although it does provide a fair amount of coverage. I realise I am giving him the benefit of the doubt, but there seems a good chance that his notability profile will rise in the near future. However, not all editors will agree with my approach, and so I would also suggest "draftifying" the article as opposed to outright deleting it—especially as it is in good shape to be improved and worked upon. Dflaw4 (talk) 13:32, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG and still too soon to create article about him. Ashishkafle (talk) 11:08, 22 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.