Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishwambhar Choudhary


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America1000 03:20, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Vishwambhar Choudhary

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Very little/ almost no valid sources to establish notability, the subject is mentioned in the recent news articles while citing opinions given by subject on various social issues. But no reason I could find to consider the subject notable.  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:55, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:07, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:07, 23 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep The person nominated this needs to understand different sources because WP is all about understanding sources. -- 18:37, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - The discussion regarding possibility of conflict of interest / paid editing of the account which has proposed this deletion is going on here. -- Abhijeet Safai (talk) 07:18, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The next discussion will be very likely about whether to indef you for slinging wild aspersions at others and refusing to back down. &#x222F; WBG converse 07:00, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment, Choudhary has had some news coverage over the years, eg. "RTI Documents Show Membership for Govt Officials at Low Rates in Lieu of Land for Poona Club", "Development of Lavasa Now Under PMRDA Ambit", "Green Brigade Frowns on Amit Shah’s Welcome With 10,000 Motorbikes", and "Ministers Fail to Convince Anna Hazare to Call Off Agitation", but more is needed to meet WP:ANYBIO notability. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:52, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete--No significant coverage is located per my searches. &#x222F; WBG converse 07:00, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing remotely approaching WP:SIGCOV in my searches; can't even find good RS where they are really the subject of the article. The refs that come up on searches are focused on other subjects, of which they are involved – E.g. Indian Express, Times of India , The Financial Express (India) , and India Times .  In all cases, hardly even gets a paragraph; and nothing about their details/bio.  Can't even make a "contrived" case for a BLP. Perhaps better Indian-language RS are available, but on en-RS, it is a delete. Britishfinance (talk) 22:56, 29 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.