Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishwavijay (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar ⨹   16:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Vishwavijay (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article's subject is a future film that does not meet the notability guideline for films. It appears that the main author may have a close connection with the topic as well. MJ94 (talk) 08:22, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Delete: amateurish article about non-existent "upcoming" Bollywood film allegedly set for release in 2016. No RS.--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 12:10, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (post)  @ 21:52, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (drawl)  @ 21:52, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Delete - only source is a blog. Whether the editor and the person whose blog are the same or two different people is immaterial as this does not meet WP:NFF. It feel like there is an uptick in these kinds of articles. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 02:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC) -Superheroprashast — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superheroprashast (talk • contribs) 12:25, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
 * delete -Fails WP:NFF. Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  13:06, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * keep:I agree that it's a future film to release in 2016. I know you will delete the page. But what about others?there are several films that have not even started filming and they have their pages in Wikipedia. If you see the page of Vishwavijay (film),there is one more source-the IMDb page of the film. I am not saying this because it's my article but because doing this(deleting the article) and not doing so with others would be injustice. If any other source will be required, I am ready to give and I will not do any disruptive editing anymore. I did this because I thought the debate was over.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.