Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visio.M


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, noting that the nomination has been withdrawn. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:03, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Visio.M

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreferenced article about a research project at a university Dweller (talk) 16:21, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:55, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:55, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:55, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:55, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:58, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Definitely nothing notable about this.  Rcsprinter123    (jive)  22:05, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:23, 29 December 2015 (UTC) That'll do nicely, thank you people. Nomination withdrawn - please can someone close this AfD asap. It's done a great job. --Dweller (talk) 09:55, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Very weak keep: I have added several German media articles, including a road test of this vehicle. This may be one step beyond articles such as those of EU FP6 projects, in that it has not only consumed significant government funding but has a functioning vehicle and seems to be continuing towards productionisation, which maybe just tips the balance for me. AllyD (talk) 09:02, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep The coverage that Ally has added amounts to a story in the Munich paper Abendzeitung and two German automotive publications. I'd say it does just meet GNG including WP:AUD. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:53, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per the media coverage. --Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 19:16, 29 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.