Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vision: Science to Applications


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:10, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Vision: Science to Applications

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable subdivision of York University; fails WP:NORG. Article in its current state is mostly WP:SPAM written by someone claiming to be affiliated with the school (who has been blocked for sockpuppetry), so I highly doubt any of the claims about the major significance of this program in the academic world are true. 2/3 of the listed sources are affiliated with the university. The first one is merely a announcement of a grant to York to establish this program. Also see WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, that minor subdivisions of a university are usually non-notable unless they're highly significant in their field. Chess (talk) (please use&#32; on reply) 20:19, 18 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 04:28, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Chess (talk) (please use&#32; on reply) 20:19, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Chess (talk) (please use&#32; on reply) 20:19, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Chess (talk) (please use&#32; on reply) 20:19, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Chess (talk) (please use&#32; on reply) 20:19, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge Not independently notable, can merge with parent organization if suitable. -- rsjaffe 🗩 🖉 20:33, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability not established, the term is not a plausible redirect, and the content is blatant copyvio from their own "About" page. Burn it. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 18:41, 26 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.