Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vista Transformation Pack (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:36, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Vista Transformation Pack
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Previous nomination was closed as No consensus after one Keep and two Delete, and should have been relisted. The article has zero sources that assert any sort of notability. The only assertion of notability at all is the line "[...] is a popular choice for Windows XP users that prefer the Windows Vista appearance". The rest is in-universe information. This is Stardocks unimportant little brother. — Jan Hofmann (talk) 00:16, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Leaning Weak Keep because of the RS coverage that includes the New York Times and Jerusalem Post, among others. I believe that could be used to expand the article. That said, I don't know that it will ever be able to sustain an article and it may be more appliacable within an article on Vista so to that end I say merge to Microsoft Vista and redirect, it may be a viable search term. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 03:15, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Kubek15(Sign!) (Contribs)  (UBX) 08:55, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Got an argument for your vote? — Jan Hofmann (talk) 13:56, 14 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep I think it only needs to be improved. Probably WP:WINDOWS or WP:SOFTWARE would be able to help out. I remember reading about this software in several publications. Saggod (talk) 02:03, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   --  brew  crewer  (yada, yada) 19:40, 14 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.