Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vistagy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 02:54, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Vistagy

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable corporation. Previously deleted by my prod back in Jan 2010. News mentions seem to be entirely press releases regarding being purchased by Siemens AG. Perhaps just redirect to Siemens? Syrthiss (talk) 21:27, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep – National U.S. news coverage confers notability. This article could use more sourcing.
 * — Northamerica1000 (talk) 01:27, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * but not multiple non-trivial news mentions. If all we can say is that it was purchased by Siemens, we might as well redirect it to Siemens. Syrthiss (talk) 12:46, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep They cover their activities, making them notable. There are ambulant results from Google news archive search to weed through.  February 17, 2004 - Vistagy Inc. of Waltham, Mass., said it sold more FiberSim software and services to Northrop Grumman Corporation for automating design and manufacturing processes for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program. Value of the sale was $1.95 million.    D r e a m Focus  20:17, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Has reliable sources and coverage, and two inline citations. --DThomsen8 (talk) 01:09, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.