Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visual Circle.org


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedily deleted, article contains no assertion of encyclopedic notability ~ trialsanderrors 08:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Visual Circle.org

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Not a notable website, spam. Nacon kantari 00:27, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The man is notable, the website is not. Simple as that.  Gan  fon  00:30, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * After reading through Evan's article, he isn't that notable either...plus both articles are unsourced.  Gan fon  00:31, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Not notable. Same thing as Ganfon. Big  top  00:43, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Davidbober 01:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. NN. —dima/s-ko/ 03:21, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom ThrustVectoring 08:20, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  Buck  ets  ofg  19:49, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Non-notable article that reads like an ad and this wiki as a webhost. Ronbo76 20:14, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete spam ~ Joe  Jklin  (  T   C  )  20:27, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Definitely Spam.  Telly   addict  21:00, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete or Keep I removed the spam that the idiot that wrote it put in. Keep it if you want, or delete this one. I don't care. User: C. Evan Sackett 16:20, 15 January 2007  (UTC)
 * Delete' - Non-notable. Spam. Philippe Beaudette 22:36, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Quick Delete Its spam. It should of been tagged with a speedy deletion. --Sir James Paul, La gloria è a dio 00:27, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable, probabbly self-promotion (the creator's username is Visual Circle). FrancoGG ( talk ) 03:02, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, I prodded this. A number of users claiming to be Evan Sackett are simultaneously creating AND vandalising articles about him, it's ridiculous.-- Dmz5  *Edits**Talk* 05:30, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * One of whom, FYI, is User:C. Evan Sackett above.- Dmz5 *Edits**Talk* 05:31, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.