Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visual literacy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep --Ichiro 23:08, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Visual literacy
From the article's talk page, this would seem to be some kind of school project, and a lot of work would appear to have gone into it. Unfortunately, however, this probably makes the article original research. Delete CLW 16:13, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * keep but tag for cleanup. It does, as stated, read as OR, but the subject appears to be valid, and the editors are nothing if not prolific, so can probably be trained to cite and format properly. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 16:59, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Needs some cleanup but otherwise a solid article. D e nni &#9775;  03:51, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Original research --Jahsonic 23:44, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

'This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!' Shreshth91
 * Keep. College courses are taught about this so why shouldn't we have an article? Calling something probably OR without any proof or basic checks is wrong. -- JJay 02:59, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Subject is valid, but tghe current article read as a technical writing assignment, not as an encyclopedic article. Also several of the images are wrongly tagged. &mdash;Ruud 13:48, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and tag for cleanup. Much of the current content is unacceptable because it's original research, but the topic is encyclopedic.  There used to be a reasonable stub article on the topic (full disclosure, I wrote the original stub).  I agree, the more recent editors need to be pointed to WP:NOR. -- Rbellin|Talk 21:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.