Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vitalijs Pavelko


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 00:51, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Vitalijs Pavelko

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Can't see how he passes WP:NSCHOLAR, and not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 00:39, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Onel 5969  TT me 00:39, 6 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. Citability in GScholar is quite low, with h-index of around 5. Nothing else indicates passing WP:PROF on other grounds. The article is full of unsourced WP:OR and is highly promotional, a borderline G11 case. Nsk92 (talk) 00:50, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:44, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:44, 6 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. Notability not evident from the article, fails WP:NSCHOLAR. --hroest 02:39, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, only evidence of WP:PROF notability is the "honored worker" award and I don't think that's enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:11, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: not enough coverage to pass general notability guidelines. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 05:39, 10 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.