Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vitarich Corporation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --SushiGeek 00:37, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Vitarich Corporation
Only contributor is Vitarich Corporation. Was originally nominated for speedy by AmiDaniel and then removed by creator without explanation. NN company advertisement, delete. --Hetar 08:24, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, the creator removing the speedy tag of an obvious piece of advertising doesn't mean it shouldn't be speedied.   Proto    ||    type    08:48, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete - nn feed company, advertisement, vision=a copyrighted logo Peter 08:53, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * still in the process of learning how this wikipedia works... please consider, author is just a novice... thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vitarich Corporation (talk • contribs)
 * Speedy delete as I originally tagged it. AmiDaniel (Talk) 03:31, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * This is not a speedy deletion, advertizing is not one of the WP:CSD. Delete, meanwhile, per WP:VSCA. Stifle 23:35, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * This would have been an obvious keep given that Vitarich is one of the largest poultry and animal feed producers in the Phillipines and has been listed on the PSE since 1962. The Avian flu epidemic has also caused a bit of newsflow for the company in the last year or so. Of course, it is also a copyvio of the history page from Vitarich's corporate website. Instead of making up new CSD criteria - a particularly egregious lapse when done by an aspiring admin - I would suggest that participants check regularly for copyvios and follow procedure. -- JJay 00:44, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 19:12, 31 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.