Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vitfoss


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:00, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Vitfoss

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement." The prod was endorsed by User:Dlohcierekim. It was deprodded by WP:SPA and its creator, User:Ite10 with the following rationale "Please, Don't delete this page, since it has been updates and some new independent citation were added.". Coming back to this after over a year, I do not consider the improvements sufficient. As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:13, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable now, as then. Just stopped by to hang a "retired" tag on my user page, so if the rationale is still valid, I would say Wikipedia is not the yellow pages, nor is it a collection of random trivial information. Really disappointed at the lack of improvement, after the impassioned plea to not honor the PROD. Dloh cierekim  22:50, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * PS been 2 years +. Dloh  cierekim
 * Delete as my searches found nothing better and none of this is better convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  00:08, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  00:08, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  00:08, 2 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.