Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vithit Utsahajit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 05:48, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Vithit Utsahajit

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not any references or sources or external links. Don't think it meets the notability guidelines either. Thursby16 (talk) 14:37, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:33, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:33, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:33, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep His Thai name is วิธิต อุตสาหจิต and is better known for his pen name บ.ก. วิติ๊ด ("บ.ก." means editor) and there is a Thai wiki article at th:วิธิต อุตสาหจิต. Google search those name instead found the following:
 * an article about him in a major printed magazine in marketing business.
 * One more . In many articles about his magazines, his wife or his daughter were interviewed instead. So I don't include those here.
 * talking about his work starting at 21:45, appearing as himself at 22:20 and then re-appearing as himself in cartoon form at around 22:45 mark. From a TV documentary in Thai PBS channel.
 * His cartoon character is a notable character appearing in his cartoon magazine (acting the role of editor). There are some LINE stickers of him in this set: According to this news  the cumulative download for that set was 300,000 in June 2014.
 * His cartoon magazines are notable: all magazine stalls should carry them. --Lerdsuwa (talk) 17:38, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as none of what's listed is convincing enough, the Thai Wiki, listed sources here or the English Wiki. The Thai article certainly seems questionable itself but I'm of course not familiar how notability at that Wiki. At best, for this English Wiki, this would be best restarted until a better article is available. SwisterTwister   talk  18:44, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * According to the news article According to this news  the magazine has been published weekly for 41 years as of 2014. So he won't appear in public much, the role went to his wife and daughter. --Lerdsuwa (talk) 06:40, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per Lerdsuwa. Satisfies GNG. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:09, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as notable for creating comics mainly as well as filmwork, the magazine articles identified by Lerdsuwal mean WP:BASIC is passed. Atlantic306 (talk) 15:41, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:56, 14 April 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:01, 21 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.