Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vito Bongiorno


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SOFTDELETE  SilkTork   ✔Tea time  23:56, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Vito Bongiorno

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Previously prodded, with the comment " Clear promotional intent: unknow artist, the same user created the same page on it.wiki, en.wiki and fr.wiki. In it.wiki the article has been speedy deleted multiple time and at last the title has been blocked" Now re-created, but the comments appear to still apply.  DGG ( talk ) 17:45, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - The speedy deletions were probably for G11, which this article does not comply with. As of now, I can't see any promotional content in this article. ---Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 17:51, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 6 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:28, 12 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment Objectively I can not see the promotional page is not for the cancellation. --Costanzo Costantini (talk) 07:11, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Objectively: the mere existence of this lemma is the proof of the promotional intent of its author. Both here and in it.wiki, this entry was always been surrounded by a number of authors linked to the artist himself (Costanzo Costantini, Elena d'agostini...). Instead, this is indicative of the level of spam. And above of all, Bongiorno himself isn't absolutely relevant for the italian contemporary art scene. To evaluate what I say, please take a deeper look to the references used in Vito Bongiorno:
 * This and this one does not speak about Bongiorno, not even mention
 * This and this one are commercial sites that link to a book of Costantini (the one above who can't see promotion...) . To be precise, not a real book, a vanity press booklet of 48 pages.
 * This is a good source to determine his existence, and the fact that on one occasion he has independently worked as body artist in Fregene. Nothing more than this.
 * This one, honestly, may be the only element that has a minimum of relevance. But it is a very local and limited event, pretty obscure even just outside the city limits.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.