Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vitruvian Park


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 23:37, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Vitruvian Park

 * – ( View AfD View log )

How does this meet WP:N? Good amount of coverage, but not enough to meet GNG. Boleyn (talk) 13:54, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:20, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Keep my gut when I cleaned it up was that the coverage is enough to meet WP:ORG. There's more that could be added, but this article isn't a priority for me beyond the cleanup. I'm not a fan of "sources exist" and leaving it for someone else, but I won't get to this during the discussion Star   Mississippi  18:52, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Articles in The Dallas Morning Post, Addison, and GlobalSt establish notability. NemesisAT (talk) 19:04, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:55, 14 August 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:00, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, enough articles in reliable sources to meet ORG.Jackattack1597 (talk) 14:10, 28 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.