Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vitthal Patil (Choreographer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Daniel (talk) 01:36, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Vitthal Patil (Choreographer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This may be a case of wp:autobiography. The same editor uploaded a high-resolution photo of the subject (File:Vitthal Patil - Choreographer - Actor - Director.jpeg) that cannot be found on the internet using Google image search. This leads me to the conclusion that the author is the subject himself, or somebody closely connected to him. The problem with the article is the wp:notability. There are four references: one to Facebook, one to the IMDb (not a reliable source per External_links/Perennial_websites), one to a YouTube trailer that does not mention the subject, and one to a page that also does not mention the subject. So, the article is basically unsourced. I tried Google general search and Google books, and there are some hits, but nothing very convincing. This is the only reliable-looking source I found. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:37, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  22:48, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete • Fails WP:verifiability and WP:notability. The article relying mainly on the social and self published sources.  C ute st Penguin '''  {talk • contribs} 15:14, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 02:07, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (gossip)  @ 12:52, 7 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete In addition to the usual sources, I gave Highbeam a shot, and had no luck improving the referencing here. --j⚛e deckertalk 15:34, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.