Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viva Las Vegas (dancer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 04:32, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Viva Las Vegas (dancer)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Overly wordy article for what appears to be a very regional phenomenon. Only RS is the Oregonian article, cited a half-dozen times. Rest are trivial mentions or non RS. Nothing found for this individual, only for the phase. Oaktree b (talk) 04:07, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Dance. Oaktree b (talk) 04:07, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Bands and musicians,  and South Dakota.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:24, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. The citations already in the article are from such reliable sources as Willamette Week, Oregon Public Broadcasting, Portland Mercury, Hyperallergic, Portland Monthly, The Oregonian, Oregon Arts Watch, and The Daily Beast (I know in some cases this last one may not be a reliable source, but since here it's a profile of the subject I accept it as proof of notability). In addition, there's also in-depth coverage of the subject on KGW (link), WNYC (link), The Portland State Vanguard (link), Here Magazine (link), The Rumpus (link), Bust Magazine (link) Brunch Magazine (link) and other places. And while Liv Osthus may indeed be a regional phenomenon, all of those sources are detailed examinations of her work, art and life, not trivial mentions. There's also a well-received documentary about her. Yes, the article needs works, including cleaning up the citations. However that's not a reason to delete. Per WP:ARTIST, this subject's work has "won significant critical attention" and so meets our notability guidelines.--SouthernNights (talk) 12:01, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per SouthernNights. The page needs some heavy editing, but the subject is notable. pburka (talk) 12:20, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - Enough coverage to pass WP:GNG. --John B123 (talk) 09:49, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: Obviously notable. Ha enough and also prominent sources Paradise Chronicle (talk) 00:01, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep As per SouthernNights. MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:40, 15 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.