Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viva Media


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:32, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Viva Media

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unnotable, fails GNG/NCORP. Lordtobi ( &#9993; ) 20:15, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 21:31, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 21:31, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 21:31, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Yes I agree, article should be deleted. It looks like Encore bought this company at some point then closed it because Viva Media's website doesn't work and it no longer appears on Encore's website, and I'm unable to find any sources or articles on Viva Media which appears not to be in business anymore. 2001:5B0:4BD3:43F8:389A:A679:99DF:BFF7 (talk) 04:34, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Article is a stub that lacks sources.TH1980 (talk) 04:32, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * An article not having long content that isn't sourced is not a deletion policy. The argument is regarding this being a notable subject.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:32, 6 January 2019 (UTC)


 * delete - that being said, my WP:BEFORE search didn't fill me with joy.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:32, 6 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.